[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Sheflug] Re: TopPage info for Sheffield Linux User Group
I think from the example of Corel Office2000 that making the Win code
wine-friendly is seen as a quick alternative to native porting. Corel's
reasons for backing wine development then become obvious. Wine itself is
still less than perfect, and having an optimised package is dangerously
close to a major fork in the code. Of course, as a GPL product they are
perfectly entitled to do this, but what are the consequences for systems
already running wine ?
A native codebase would of course have to adhere to Unix/Linux standards so
the sloppy practices of Windows would be avoided (and a new set of sloppy
Linux practices put in it's place, no doubt), not to mention the
duplication of effort.
If Windows-developed apps are specifically targeted as cross-platform
along with a stable Wine, then we benefit by the availablity of popular
packages. However, I don't see it being as good a solution as a native app
running without another software layer between it and the OS.
On Friday, May 19, 2000 2:12 PM, Al Hudson [SMTP:eah106 [at] york.ac.uk] wrote:
>
> Paul Sims wrote:
> > Just looked at the page below - this needs an aparrently app-optimised
> > wine to run (downloadable from the same page), so it's not **really**
for
> > Linux, just wine-compat windows code :(
>
> Not necessarily. Wine does two things: emulates a running Windows system,
> and provides a compatibility layer for native Linux programs to access
> Windows API functions.
>
> > It's becoming depressingly regular that these major s/w announcements
> > conceal this sort of "porting" so we all end up running the same dodgy
> > windows code under quasi-emulation.
>
> I don't see why the linux code would be less dodgy than the windows code
> by the same programmers?
>
> Richard wrote:
> > I had a look myself and it looks like a Red Hat rpm.
>
> It's not - it's compatible with SuSE, Turbolinux, etc...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alex.
>
"WorldSecure Server <lombard.co.uk>" made the following
annotations on 05/19/00 14:49:07
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed within this email represent those of the
individual and not necessarily those of Lombard North Central.
The contents of this Email may be privileged and are confidential. It may not be disclosed to or used by anyone other than the addressee(s), nor copied in any way. If received in error, please advise the sender, then delete from your system.
Should you wish to use Email as a mode of communication, Lombard North Central PLC are unable to guarantee the security of Email content outside of our own computer systems.
Lombard North Central PLC
Registered in England No 337004
Registered Office 3 Princess Way Redhill Surrey RH1 1NP
A Member of the Royal Bank of Scotland Group
==============================================================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheffield Linux User's Group - http://www.sheflug.co.uk
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
- <sheflug-request [at] vuw.ac.nz> - with the word
"unsubscribe" in the body of the message.
GNU the choice of a complete generation.