Re: [Sheflug] Opera & BIND-9

[Richard <nospam [at] sheflug.co.uk>]

Alex

On 3 Feb 2001, Alex Hudson wrote:

> Moving onto the bad - Opera. I have it running under Debian
> stable/testing, 2.2.2 +. The '+' includes glibc-2.2, which I think maybe
> causing the problem. It runs, but ohhh my gawd is it unstable. I got the
> .deb of the static version, and it segfaults all over the place :( I
> have to say, I don't like it a great deal, MDI annoys me, not being able
> to see the link I have the mouse pointer over annoys me, viewing source
> in 'xview' annoys me, etc. etc. (no, I haven't configured it yet :).
> But, it is faster than Moz on my system (although, I suspect Galeon will
> run around the same speed, although I haven't got a version of it on my
> machine currently), but Moz looks absolutely rock-solid compared to
> Opera. Weird. Anyone else had this problem?

I was thinking about trying this with Debian but I was a bit worried
that something like this might happen.

I've got Beta 5 going in SuSE which came from the cover disk for Linux
Format.  Works very well.

If it was free I wouldn't use Netscape at all.

Tried to install the bind9 update into my net facing box.  For the
first time this year and last year YaST barfed and refused to install.
That was with an SuSE update from their ftp site.  So, no luck with that I'm
afraid.


 Thanks


Richard

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheffield Linux User's Group - http://www.sheflug.co.uk
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
- <sheflug-request [at] vuw.ac.nz> - with the word 
 "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. 

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.