Re: [Sheflug] 2.4.4

[Will Newton <nospam [at] misconception.org.uk>]

On Sun, 13 May 2001, Richard Ibbotson wrote:

> Previously I tried 2.4.0, 2.4.2, and 2.4.3.  All of them exited with
> at least two error messages.  Even the sound works and so does
> everything else.  Haven't seen a kernel compile that smooth for at
> least a year.

All the 2.4.x kernels compile cleanly here. 2.4.4 seems OK but the fork
code seems to have damaged performance to my eyes. Hopefully 2.4.5 fixes
it.

> Following the advice of the SuSE security team I won't be using it on
> my net facing box.

Hmmm, I would imagine 2.4 is at least as secure as 2.2.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheffield Linux User's Group - http://www.sheflug.co.uk
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
- <sheflug-request [at] vuw.ac.nz> - with the word 
 "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. 

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.