[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sheflug] 2.4.15 ext2 breakage - patch

To: Sheffield LUG <shef-lug [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Sheflug] 2.4.15 ext2 breakage - patch
From: Alex Hudson <xxxxx [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 23 Nov 2001 22:34:23 +0000
Envelope-To: <shef-lug [at] list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Id: Sheflug <shef-lug.list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-Post: <mailto:shef-lug [at] list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-Subscribe: <http://community.uklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/shef-lug>,<mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://community.uklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/shef-lug>,<mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-To: shef-lug [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: shef-lug-admin [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 2001-11-23 at 22:24, -cej wrote:
> Here's the patch as posted to LKML. I suspect untested (seeing as Al's left
> his comment from version 1 of his patch in right at the top).

I decided to get Pan out, and subscribe to the ng. that you recommend.
Looks like it was worth it - someone's reporting a hard lock-up on an
IBM ThinkPad T21. I have a T20, and I've seen exactly the same thing on
occasion, so I'll be watching that one too.

> I'm wondering whether to hold back now for 2.4.16... *sigh*

I think I'll at least wait for the patch to see some testing :-) The
idea of having to get out debugfs on a weekend does not fill me with
joy...

Cheers,

Alex.

PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Sheflug] 2.4.15 ext2 breakage - patch
  - From: Barrie Bremner

References:
- [Sheflug] 2.4.15 ext2 breakage - patch
  - From: -cej

Prev by Date: [Sheflug] 2.4.15 ext2 breakage - patch
Next by Date: Re: [Sheflug] FYI ... 2.5.0 released.
Prev by thread: [Sheflug] 2.4.15 ext2 breakage - patch
Next by thread: Re: [Sheflug] 2.4.15 ext2 breakage - patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread