Re: [Sheflug] Unoffical Mozilla debs

[Alex Hudson <xxxxx [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 18:07, Chris J wrote:
> Yes I'd seen that is was in unstable, however what I seemed to ascertain from 
> the newsgroup archives is that Mozilla from unstable seemed to be running 
> fine under stable and testing.

Well, you'd be wrong I'm afraid :) Mozilla from unstable/testing
(they're pretty close in version ATM) will not run fine under stable -
it will get you to upgrade large parts of your system. It _will_ work,
but it won't be "stable" any more - critical parts (libc, for example)
will be from testing/unstable. 

If you want a Mozilla for _stable_, you need to go to Ximian.

Or did I mention that already?

:)

Cheers,

Alex.

PGP signature