[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sheflug] GNU Hurd

To: shef-lug [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Sheflug] GNU Hurd
From: Will Newton <xxxxx [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 22:11:55 +0100
Envelope-to: <shef-lug [at] list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-help: <mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=help>
List-id: Sheflug <shef-lug.list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-post: <mailto:shef-lug [at] list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-subscribe: <http://community.uklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/shef-lug>,<mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://community.uklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/shef-lug>,<mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: shef-lug [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: shef-lug-admin [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Tuesday 30 Apr 2002 9:36 pm, Eric E Moore wrote:

> That doesn't necesarially indicate it's way off, most Linux
> distributions had a C ABI change with the shift to glibc-2.0, but it
> was usable before and after.

> Granted, I think "end of the year" is a mite optimistic, but claiming
> redhat 5.0 was a way off from being a replacement for 4.2 because it
> had a C ABI change wouldn't fly...

I didn't say that, and wouldn't. The acronym "e.g." can be read as "for 
example". Re-read what I wrote, I did not say "i.e." in which case your 
comments would be accurate.

___________________________________________________________________

Sheffield Linux User's Group -
http://www.sheflug.co.uk/mailfaq.html

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Sheflug] GNU Hurd
  - From: Eric E Moore

Prev by Date: Re: [Sheflug] GNU Hurd
Next by Date: Re: [Sheflug] GNU Hurd
Previous by thread: Re: [Sheflug] GNU Hurd
Next by thread: Re: [Sheflug] GNU Hurd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread