RE: [Sheflug] test

[(Ted Harding) <xxxxx [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hmm. Sorry for the supernumerary postings -- it seems my original
message did finally get through (as well as my test and the re-send).

However, from the headers in the original as received from shef-lug:

Received: from s3.uklinux.net (s3 [80.84.64.13] (may be forged)) by
 s3.uklinux.net (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g87HS7106440;
 Sat, 7 Sep 2002 18:28:07 +0100

Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94])
 by s3.uklinux.net (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g87EWk118785 for
 <shef-lug [at] list.sheflug.org.uk>; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 15:32:46 +0100

so there was a 3-hour gap within s3.uklinux.net

(and what's that "may be forged" doing?)

Cheers,
Ted.

On 07-Sep-02 Ted Harding wrote:
> Just testing (thought I sent a mail a couple of hours ago but it hasn't
> got through)
> Ted.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding [at] nessie.mcc.ac.uk>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 07-Sep-02                                       Time: 18:40:01
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________

Sheffield Linux User's Group -
http://www.sheflug.co.uk/mailfaq.html

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.