[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Sheflug] Re: MySQL

To: <shef-lug [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Sheflug] Re: MySQL
From: "James Mears" <james [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 21:25:33 -0000
Delivered-to: shef-lug [at] list.sheflug.org.uk
Importance: Normal
List-help: <mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=help>
List-id: Sheflug <shef-lug.list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-post: <mailto:shef-lug [at] list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-subscribe: <http://community.uklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/shef-lug>,<mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://community.uklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/shef-lug>,<mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: shef-lug [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: shef-lug-admin [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Some helpful and potentially witty guidelines for big bad sig people  

I like the web site. Quite a good read.


I don't think that many IT and legal departments are worried about the
length of the SIG as long as all of the perceived legal issues are
covered. 

"This email may contain content that does not reflect the views of the
company.........."
Bla, bla bla... 


Some users do not get a choice. I would rather have the SIG than not
have the posting from somebody interested in the LUG :-)

James

___________________________________________________________________

Sheffield Linux User's Group -
http://www.sheflug.co.uk/mailfaq.html

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [Sheflug] Re: MySQL
  - From: Neil R Porter

Prev by Date: RE: [Sheflug] Re: MySQL
Next by Date: Re: [Sheflug] Re: MySQL
Previous by thread: Re: [Sheflug] Re: MySQL
Next by thread: RE: [Sheflug] Re: MySQL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread