[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sheflug] CFLAGS and USE Question

To: shef-lug [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Sheflug] CFLAGS and USE Question
From: Brett Royles <somecoolpc [at] xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:45:35 +0100
Delivered-to: shef-lug [at] list.sheflug.org.uk
List-help: <mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=help>
List-id: Sheflug <shef-lug.list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-post: <mailto:shef-lug [at] list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-subscribe: <http://community.uklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/shef-lug>,<mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://community.uklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/shef-lug>,<mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: shef-lug [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: shef-lug-admin [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> You should be OK with what you have selected. I have an AMD64 install
> with similar CFLAGS (although 64 bit compiled and a 32 bit chroot) and
> it works fine. Also had a PIII with very similar that worked great until
> it stopped posting :(

I agree , those flags seem good to me , I personally use -O6 , but
thats just me!!!

I also have a 64 bit system , and I would be intrested on how you get
the 32bit chroot to work, so any info would be gladly accepted , oh
yea Gentoo Rocks!!!

Brett
___________________________________________________________________

Sheffield Linux User's Group -
http://www.sheflug.co.uk/mailfaq.html

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Sheflug] CFLAGS and USE Question
  - From: Marcus D. Hanwell

References:
- [Sheflug] CFLAGS and USE Question
  - From: Wonkey Donkey
- Re: [Sheflug] CFLAGS and USE Question
  - From: Marcus Hanwell

Prev by Date: [Sheflug] Re: Linux Technical Resource Kit
Next by Date: Re: [Sheflug] Re: Linux Technical Resource Kit
Previous by thread: Re: [Sheflug] CFLAGS and USE Question
Next by thread: Re: [Sheflug] CFLAGS and USE Question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread