[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Sheflug] UnionFS // multiple spool POP daemon

To: Sheffield Linux Users Group <sheflug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Sheflug] UnionFS // multiple spool POP daemon
From: Chris J <cej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:39:38 +0100
Delivered-to: sheflug@meiring.org.uk
List-help: <mailto:sheflug-request@sheflug.org.uk?subject=help>
List-id: <sheflug_sheflug.org.uk.sheflug.org.uk>
List-post: <mailto:sheflug@sheflug.org.uk>
List-subscribe: <http://sheflug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/sheflug_sheflug.org.uk>, <mailto:sheflug-request@sheflug.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://sheflug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/sheflug_sheflug.org.uk>, <mailto:sheflug-request@sheflug.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: sheflug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: sheflug-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0pre (X11/20070325)

Hi all,

Wondering if anyone has experience of the UnionFS[1] patch for Linux, 
with regards reliability and performance?

Also, has anyone ever come across a POP daemon that can read mail from 
two separate mail spools?

You can probably guess the two are related ;) Looking at HA-mail & pop 
servers, and trying to avoid single point of failure (even with the RAID 
- I've suffered catastrophic RAID issues, and its not pretty).

Cheers,

Chris...


_______________________________________________
        Sheffield Linux User's Group
  http://www.sheflug.org.uk/mailfaq.html
 GNU - The choice of a complete generation

Prev by Date: Re: [Sheflug] NVidia on SuSE and the SuSE/Novell/M$ thing
Next by Date: Re: [Sheflug] NVidia on SuSE and the SuSE/Novell/M$ thing
Previous by thread: Re: [Sheflug] Is the list's sig supposed to be munged?
Next by thread: [Sheflug] RPM/Apt-Get
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread