[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: assembler [was: Re: cheers for gogo]
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 will [at] south-of-heaven.demon.co.uk wrote:
> > I'll close with a brief(ish) summary: I disaggree that assembler is dead, and
> > I believe there is still a use for it (if there is not, why are students on
> > Electronic Engineering courses taught 8085/Z80 or 68000 assembler? Btw, I
>
> Software Engineers get taught bugger all assembler at Sheffield Uni as far
> as I can tell, which I believe is a BAD thing.
Not a lot in Comp Sci at Leeds Uni. either.
> ... It is a good way of seeing
> another perspective of your code. Makes you appreciate C++ when you have
> it as well.
I wouldn't go that far. Never seen anything even vaguely make me
appreciate C++ . It's bloatware spawn of the devil :-)
> We only need to know Java(TM) apparently.
So rumour has it.
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheffield Linux User's Group - http://www.sheflug.co.uk
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
- <sheflug-request [at] vuw.ac.nz> - with the word
"unsubscribe" in the body of the message.
GNU the choice of a complete generation.