Re: [Sheflug] 2.4 kernel

[Will Newton <nospam [at] misconception.org.uk>]

On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, kbarrass wrote:

> ive just downloaded and compiled a copy of the 2.4 test2  kernel with the
> same minimal options as i was using on the 2.2.16 but the kernel is over 100
> KB bigger is all this extra code bug fixes?

I've had nothing but trouble with that kernel. It's very broken (although
some things work better than test1 :)
The difference in size is probably that the 2.2.16 kernel was fully
modularized whereas your 2.4.0test kernel is likely more monolithic. Not a
problem really.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheffield Linux User's Group - http://www.sheflug.co.uk
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
- <sheflug-request [at] vuw.ac.nz> - with the word 
 "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. 

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.