[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sheflug] Bloatware (was Re: NHS privatisation + IT)

To: "Sheflug" <sheflug [at] vuw.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: [Sheflug] Bloatware (was Re: NHS privatisation + IT)
From: "Alex Hudson" <nospam [at] alexhudson.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 20:41:47 -0000
List-help: <http://www.sheflug.co.uk>
List-owner: <mailto:sheflug-admins [at] vuw.ac.nz>
List-post: <mailto:sheflug [at] vuw.ac.nz>
List-subscribe: <mailto:sheflug-request [at] vuw.ac.nz?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:sheflug-request [at] vuw.ac.nz?Subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: "Sheflug" <sheflug [at] vuw.ac.nz>
Sender: sheflug-bounce [at] vuw.ac.nz


> I'm not really trying to make this a free/non-free thing. I'm trying
> to talk about bloat/non-bloat. Bloated software is bad, no matter
> whether your software is free or not. It's a software engineering
> issue.

Isn't it interesting the route free software is taking currently, though?

References:
- Re: NHS privatisation + IT (was [Sheflug] Computing)
  - From: David Mitchell <davem [at] fdgroup.co.uk>
- Re: NHS privatisation + IT (was [Sheflug] Computing)
  - From: Richard <richard [at] sheflug.co.uk>
- Re: NHS privatisation + IT (was [Sheflug] Computing)
  - From: Graham Spearing <graham [at] tux.uklinux.net>
- Re: NHS privatisation + IT (was [Sheflug] Computing)
  - From: Richard <richard [at] sheflug.co.uk>
- Re: NHS privatisation + IT (was [Sheflug] Computing)
  - From: Alastair Donlon <adonlon [at] netsoc.ucd.ie>
- Re: NHS privatisation + IT (was [Sheflug] Computing)
  - From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull [at] sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
- [Sheflug] Bloatware (was Re: NHS privatisation + IT)
  - From: Alastair Donlon <adonlon [at] netsoc.ucd.ie>

Prev by Date: Re: [Sheflug] Tenuous Connection - More stupid newbie problems
Next by Date: No Subject
Prev by thread: [Sheflug] Bloatware (was Re: NHS privatisation + IT)
Next by thread: [Sheflug] Bloatware (was Re: NHS privatisation + IT)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread