Re: [Sheflug] GCC 2.96..bugfix/errata :-)

[Barrie Bremner <nospam [at] ecosse.net>]

Chris J/#6 wrote:
> 
> ...Quite a long thread afterwards, and Alan Cox does defend RH,
> to a point, but he does a lot of stuff for RH anyway (so draw your own
> conclusions). But he goes on to say that if you are planning on writing
> code and releasing binaries, use Redhat 6.2. The general consensus seems
> to be that RH did a silly thing having a dist with an development/snapshot
> compiler.
> 
> Chris...

 Yeah, I read this at the time, and AC was taking some serious flak.
Still, I hope that RH will learn.

 Baz.
--
Barrie J. Bremner

Email:     TheEnglishman [at] ecosse.net
           (PGP public key available at pgp.mit.edu)

URL:       http://www.geocities.com/thefatenglishman

Telephone: UK 01672 811246

 The answer to your question is...Welcome to tomorrow!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheffield Linux User's Group - http://www.sheflug.co.uk
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
- <sheflug-request [at] vuw.ac.nz> - with the word 
 "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. 

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.