Re: [Sheflug] Reply-To headers this time.

["Chris J/#6" <nospam [at] nccnet.co.uk>]

> I am now seeing:
> 
> Feb  2 20:34:18 flux qmail: 981146058.264330 delivery 115: failure:
> Connected_to_62.172.47.250_but_sender_was_rejected./Remote_host_said:_550_rejected:_cannot_route_to_sender_<baz [at] flux.localdomain>/
> 
> I've also seen in headers the following:
> 
> X-BadReturnPath: baz [at] flux.localdomain rewritten as
> TheEnglishman [at] ecosse.net using "Reply-To" header
> 
> It seems that Qmail is now adjusting emails so they appear to be from
> TheEnglishman [at] ecosse.net (baz..not rewritten as..TheEnglishman..)
> however the return path doesn't seem to right!!!
> 
> Arrgh!!!!!
> 
> Could someone help me out here?


Maybe...if I knew how things were setup now :) I run qmail without a problem 
(qmail nice ... qmail worked when exim didn't about 4 years ago when exim was 
realtively new).

How's qmail (and associated environment setup) - and whats the bounce coming 
back...it's unclear where the destination of the above email was meant to be 
(yourself? but you said things are being re-written, so maybe external?)...a 
copy of the bounce *might* help :)

Chris...


-- 
Chris Johnson            \  "If not for me then, do it for yourself. If not
sixie@nccnet.co.uk        \  for then do it for the world." -- Stevie Nicks
www.nccnet.co.uk/~sixie/   ~---------------------------------------+
Redclaw chat - http://redclaw.org.uk - telnet redclaw.org.uk 2000   \______


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheffield Linux User's Group - http://www.sheflug.co.uk
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
- <sheflug-request [at] vuw.ac.nz> - with the word 
 "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. 

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.