Re: [Sheflug] Up grading to core

[Craig Andrews <xxxxx [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with glibc2.2.4 being very stable. Installed it on RH6.2. Upgraded
GCC to 2.95, make to 2.79 and did a make install. Thats about it.

No problems so far, except that the version of Ximian red carpet I
downloaded doesn't work any more. No big loss :)

Craig

On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, José Luis Gómez Dans wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 10:59:56AM +0100, Damien J. Dye wrote:
> > Let me Know how you get on using gcc3.01 because I getting ready to install that my self allong
> > with glibc2.4
>
> 	gcc 3.0.2 works fine here (C99, K7 architecture). g77 is doing
> alright as well. As for glibc2.4, you might want to have a look at glibc
> 2.2.4. The former is still a long way in coming. On the benefits of the
> latter, I run it, and no problems so far. However, I am yet to use
> something that wasn't available on libc5 myself :-) (Yes, I do use
> printf and little else, don't I? :D).
>
> 	Jose
>

___________________________________________________________________

Sheffield Linux User's Group - http://www.sheflug.co.uk . 
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to 
shef-lug-request@list.sheflug.org.uk with the word
"unsubscribe" in the body of the message. 

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.