[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Sheflug] Re: ntl bb conx

To: shef-lug [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Sheflug] Re: ntl bb conx
From: Richard Ibbotson <xxxxx [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 12:54:21 +0100
Envelope-to: <shef-lug [at] list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-help: <mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=help>
List-id: Sheflug <shef-lug.list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-post: <mailto:shef-lug [at] list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-subscribe: <http://community.uklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/shef-lug>,<mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://community.uklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/shef-lug>,<mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Sheffield Linux User's Group
Reply-to: shef-lug [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: shef-lug-admin [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.4.1

Damian

> followed this proceedure... and it didn't work. It seems like the
> dhcp server is not assigning an IP address again.


Yes.  I've seen this with a lot of Linux systems and with windoze as 
well.  Seems to be that the ISP's DHCP servers are very slow at 
replying to the gateway box.  Doesn't seem to make much difference 
which software you use.  Some days you get an instant response and 
other days it can take forever.

Can you format your text please.  I can't read your message for the 
other crap that's mixed in with it.

Thanks


-- 
Richard
___________________________________________________________________

Sheffield Linux User's Group -
http://www.sheflug.co.uk/mailfaq.html

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.

References:
- Re: [Sheflug] ntl bb conx
  - From: xxxxx

Prev by Date: Re: [Sheflug] ntl bb conx
Next by Date: Re: [Sheflug] 1 Billion for IT
Previous by thread: Re: [Sheflug] ntl bb conx
Next by thread: [Sheflug] Sybase
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread