[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Sheflug] Re: Memory issues

To: shef-lug [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Sheflug] Re: Memory issues
From: Richard Ibbotson <xxxxx [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 17:29:15 +0100
Envelope-to: <shef-lug [at] list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-help: <mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=help>
List-id: Sheflug <shef-lug.list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-post: <mailto:shef-lug [at] list.sheflug.org.uk>
List-subscribe: <http://community.uklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/shef-lug>,<mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://community.uklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/shef-lug>,<mailto:shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Sheffield Linux User's Group
Reply-to: shef-lug [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: shef-lug-admin [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.4.1

Steve

> I'm finding that OOo running in KDE3 is a little sluggish on some
> of our machines. Some of these boxes have 64MB RAM and others have
> 96MB. I know this is probably not enough and I'm looking to
> increase to 128MB min. across the board. However, what other ways
> can I save some memory here and there?

Chrysler.. looks like I wiped myself out with the last one :)


Probably not a popular answer for a commercial solution but what about 
LTSP.  That's what GB Direct user over in Bradford.

I'm sure that someone else will come up with something better.


-- 
Thanks



Richard
___________________________________________________________________

Sheffield Linux User's Group -
http://www.sheflug.co.uk/mailfaq.html

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.

References:
- [Sheflug] Memory issues
  - From: Steve Tickle

Prev by Date: [Sheflug] Memory issues
Next by Date: Re: [Sheflug] Memory issues
Previous by thread: [Sheflug] Memory issues
Next by thread: Re: [Sheflug] Memory issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread