[Sheflug] Re: Poll: Are occasional posts about SlugBug meets OK?

[Lesley Binks <lesley.binks [at] xxxxxxxxx>]

shef-lug-request [at] list.sheflug.org.uk wrote:
<snip>
> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 00:00:54 +0100
> From: Gary Stimson <bulk [at] stimson.org.uk>
> Subject: [Sheflug] Poll: Are occasional posts about SlugBug meets OK?
<snip>
> Dear list,
>
> This is a reply to an email sent to me by Richard Ibbotson one week after I 
> posted a short note to this list to let people know about a meeting of 
> SlugBug. I am replying publicly because his email raises important 
> questions about the constitutional structure of Sheflug and about who 
> decides what is and is not OK to post to the list.
>
> *** After reading the below, I would be most appreciative if you would post 
> a reply to the list on this yes/no question: ***
>
> "Do you object if someone posts an announcement to the Sheflug mailing list 
> about a forthcoming Slugbug meeting?"
<snip>

No I don't object to postings about Slugbug events on this list.
If it hadn't been for a previous posting on this list I wouldn't have 
known about the existence of the SlugBug group.

I would prefer it if both (B)LUGs could live side by side in at least a 
live and let live kind of way.  Very sad one party on this side seems 
unwilling to be co-operative.

Regards

Lesley
___________________________________________________________________

Sheffield Linux User's Group -
http://www.sheflug.co.uk/mailfaq.html

 GNU the choice of a complete generation.