Re: [sheflug] Apache, shtml and php config. problem

["Wonkey Donkey" <wonkey_donkey [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ruth Gunstone" <ruth [at] cybusmedia.co.uk>
To: <sheflug [at] sheflug.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: [sheflug] Apache, shtml and php config. problem


> In message <44E0DB90.6080005 [at] zen.co.uk>
>          Lesley Binks <lesley.binks [at] zen.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Ruth Gunstone wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>> My 'other' machine, the one I'm typing from now, doesn't run Windows
>>> /or/ Linux /or/ MacOS, so is to all intents 'invulnerable' to all
>>> those nasties out there :-)
>>>
>> ... or not .. as the case may be :)
>> Your list still leaves Solaris *BSD VAX/VMS AIX to name but 4.
>
> -- 
> Ruth Gunstone
>

Going slightly off-topic.....

I didn't realise we had any Solaris buffs here. Or am I just mis-reading.

It's one OS I always have time for. I know some folks consider it to be 
'limited' in terms of a desktop OS, but its the only one I can honestly say 
I have never seen crash; and what it does do, it does it simply and without 
any fuss.

Also, we have Solaris servers at work, that run 24/7. Best thing about them 
is that we never have to spend any time on maintenance or fault-fixing or 
bug-bashing. In the time they have been installed (since about 1998), I 
could count on one hand the number of times they have had to be re-started; 
and only then for application software upgrades. For mission-critical 
systems, I wouldn't look at anything else.

Steve. 



___________________________________________________________________

Sheffield Linux User's Group -
http://www.sheflug.co.uk/mailfaq.html

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.