[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sheflug] Network design problem

To: sheflug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Sheflug] Network design problem
From: Tom Bird <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:13:36 +0000
Delivered-to: sheflug@meiring.org.uk
List-help: <mailto:sheflug-request@sheflug.org.uk?subject=help>
List-id: <sheflug_sheflug.org.uk.sheflug.org.uk>
List-post: <mailto:sheflug@sheflug.org.uk>
List-subscribe: <http://sheflug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/sheflug_sheflug.org.uk>, <mailto:sheflug-request@sheflug.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://sheflug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/sheflug_sheflug.org.uk>, <mailto:sheflug-request@sheflug.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: sheflug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: sheflug-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080109)

Peter Humphrey wrote:

> ethnet          192.168.128.0/17
> wapnet          192.168.192.0/19

> $ cat /etc/conf.d/net
> config_eth0=( "192.168.128.49 netmask 255.255.128.0 brd 192.168.255.255" )
> config_eth1=( "192.168.192.210 netmask 255.255.224.0 brd 192.168.223.255" )

These overlap.  This is bad.

> It seems to me that the wireless subnet (wapnet) should be routable through 
> the ethernet (ethnet), but watching the server's interfaces with tcpdump I 
> see pop3 requests from the laptop coming in on the wireless interface but 
> not going out on the ethernet. I do have ip_forward set to 1, and:

_______________________________________________
        Sheffield Linux User's Group
  http://www.sheflug.org.uk/mailfaq.html
 GNU - The choice of a complete generation

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Sheflug] Network design problem
  - From: Peter Humphrey

References:
- [Sheflug] Network design problem
  - From: Peter Humphrey

Prev by Date: [Sheflug] Network design problem
Next by Date: Re: [Sheflug] Network design problem
Previous by thread: [Sheflug] Network design problem
Next by thread: Re: [Sheflug] Network design problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread