[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sheflug] Network design problem

To: sheflug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Sheflug] Network design problem
From: Peter Humphrey <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:57:05 +0000
Delivered-to: sheflug@meiring.org.uk
List-help: <mailto:sheflug-request@sheflug.org.uk?subject=help>
List-id: <sheflug_sheflug.org.uk.sheflug.org.uk>
List-post: <mailto:sheflug@sheflug.org.uk>
List-subscribe: <http://sheflug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/sheflug_sheflug.org.uk>, <mailto:sheflug-request@sheflug.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://sheflug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/sheflug_sheflug.org.uk>, <mailto:sheflug-request@sheflug.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: at home
Reply-to: sheflug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: sheflug-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.7

On Friday 14 March 2008 14:13:36 Tom Bird wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > ethnet          192.168.128.0/17
> > wapnet          192.168.192.0/19
> >
> > $ cat /etc/conf.d/net
> > config_eth0=( "192.168.128.49 netmask 255.255.128.0 brd
> > 192.168.255.255" ) config_eth1=( "192.168.192.210 netmask 255.255.224.0
> > brd 192.168.223.255" )
>
> These overlap.  This is bad.

I thought it was an example of sub-netting. Have I misunderstood that 
concept? Where can I find an explanation?

-- 
Rgds
Peter

_______________________________________________
        Sheffield Linux User's Group
  http://www.sheflug.org.uk/mailfaq.html
 GNU - The choice of a complete generation

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Sheflug] Network design problem
  - From: Gary Stimson
- Re: [Sheflug] Network design problem
  - From: Lesley Binks

References:
- [Sheflug] Network design problem
  - From: Peter Humphrey
- Re: [Sheflug] Network design problem
  - From: Tom Bird

Prev by Date: Re: [Sheflug] Network design problem
Next by Date: Re: [Sheflug] Network design problem
Previous by thread: Re: [Sheflug] Network design problem
Next by thread: Re: [Sheflug] Network design problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread