Re: Cheers for GoGo.

["Foz" <nospam [at] mmu.ac.uk>]

> One thing gogo proves: assembly is still the most effeicient thing to code 
> in, if you're up to it...now I've got nasm, I'll be taking a peek and the 
> asmutils package, and considering going back to 80x86 coding. :) [against 
> assembly language: "did someone mention they wanted portability? don't make 
> me laugh :)"]

Finally, someone agrees with me! If I want portability then C is fine, 
but I would rather have two streamlined packages for two separate 
chips, because when you have the code for one chip converting is 
relatively easy, due to you working out all the problems on the first 
chip.

Cheers

-----------------------------------------------------
Paul Aspinall
Manchester Metropolitan University
-----------------------------------------------------
"AL goes into DL, 8 goes into AH
Call INT 666....
Here comes Satan!"  :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheffield Linux User's Group - http://www.sheflug.co.uk
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
- <sheflug-request [at] vuw.ac.nz> - with the word 
 "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. 

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.