Re: 2.2.13 - modules - failed dependancies

["Chris J/#6" <nospam [at] nccnet.co.uk>]

Yep - make dep && make clean && make bzImage && make modules && make 
modules_install

I'd like to replace the source tree with a virgin (ie, 
non-vendor-bastardised) one, but I've been told I can't do 
that...unfortuantly I was on holiday last week when they had the meeting to 
discuss what we were going to do with the server (config and setup, upwards), 
so I can't really do much about it. Part of the reason, I think, is to ensure 
we still have DELL support for it (which, to be honest, means jack - they 
said the Sony tape wouldn't work properly with Linux as it has a lun per tape 
slot, and Linux didn't support it &c, but I've got the thing working - and it 
only uses two lun's...see earlier post).

I may try a make mrproper, and blast /lib/modules away fully to ensure its a 
clean clean install. It seems at time some people in management would rather 
blame a vendor and waste both time and money when I could get the thing 
running smoothly in an hour or so, saving them a lot of money. Ah well...ours 
is not to reason why...

Chris...





-- 
@}-,'--------------------------------------------------  Chris Johnson --'-{ [at] 
    / "(it is) crucial that we learn the difference / sixie [at] nccnet.co.uk  \
   / between Sex and Gender. Therein lies the key  /                       \ 
  / to our freedom" -- LB                         / www.nccnet.co.uk/~sixie \ 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheffield Linux User's Group - http://www.sheflug.co.uk
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
- <sheflug-request [at] vuw.ac.nz> - with the word 
 "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. 

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.