RE: [Sheflug] C++ , & 2.4 kernel upgrade

[Will Newton <nospam [at] misconception.org.uk>]

On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

> 5) Virtual memory - using disk to store unused RAM.  Currently 2.2
>    does a pretty bad job of this for IDE.  2.4 does somewhat better or
>    even worse depending on the VM-of-the-week.  I haven't checked the
>    kernel lists in about a week, this may be getting better.

test9 is still giving me kswapd with 80-90% CPU at times. It's starting to
really get on my wick.
Really the "new" seems to have much the same issues as the "old" one.
 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheffield Linux User's Group - http://www.sheflug.co.uk
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
- <sheflug-request [at] vuw.ac.nz> - with the word 
 "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. 

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.