Simon Brown <simon [at] cliffestones.demon.co.uk> writes: > From debian-uk, food for thought? > >> MICROSOFT RESEARCH LECTURE >> This is a PUBLIC lecture >> ________________________________ >> >> TITLE: The Economics of Open Source Software - Prospects, Pitfalls and >> Politics >> SPEAKER: Dr Stefan Kooths >> INSTITUTION: University of Muenster There's a whole paper here: http://mice.uni-muenster.de/mers/mers4-OpenSource_en.pdf For the most part, I think he's missing the point. He hasn't spent much time in the open source world. The basic argument is that without users paying for software, there's no incentive to make the software the users want the most. But the reality is that open source doesn't deal with this as poorly as he thinks (e.g. he admits that for those people programming as a means of showing off, a successful project is better than an unsuccessful one, but then ignores that this provides an incentive to ask users what they want). Secondly, if you look at Linux development most of the people (if you measure by lines of code written) are getting paid to do it, e.g. by a distributor, consulting company, or whatnot. -- Eric E. Moore
Attachment:
pgp00002.pgp
Description: PGP signature