Re: [Sheflug] Re: 2.4.4

[Alex Hudson <nospam [at] alexhudson.com>]

On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 08:20:01PM +0100, Craig Andrews wrote:
> > on. But, the reasons I have is that 2.4 falls over every five minutes, it's
> > just not stable enough (caveat: I haven't tried the new OOM fixes, that
> 
> I beg to differ. I have not once had a problem with 2.4.4 stability wise.

Yeah, but like I said, I'm not running the latest 2.4.

> It is just as stable as 2.2.x for general desktop use, and seems to bring
> something of a speed boost to boot (although it is probably my imagination
> ;)

I'll try it and see. It's been probably about two (usage) hours since my
last Linux crash, so here's hoping.


> However, I have not tried it in a high-load always on server environment
> (where I still run 2.2.18) or my laptop (2.2.17)

My desktop is higher load than any of my servers :)

Cheers,

Alex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheffield Linux User's Group - http://www.sheflug.co.uk
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
- <sheflug-request [at] vuw.ac.nz> - with the word 
 "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. 

  GNU the choice of a complete generation.