Re: [Sheflug] Apologies: Writing to NTFS

[Jon Masters <jonathan [at] xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alex Hudson wrote:

| On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:23, Jon Masters wrote:
|
|>Of course you might know how to use HTML mail properly but this does not
|>detract from the fact that both myself and many others instantly shy
|>away from it with such instinctive reactions and conclusions about
|>original senders which might not be justified but happen anyway.

| Don't worry, we'll re-educate you eventually. ;)

Hey I am all for this sort of thing one day but just not today. I have
no reason to use HTML for my mail and about a million which give me
cause not to do so now. The main one is of course that almost all of the
HTML mail I receive is unpleasant in formatting or it is SPAM.

| The NT kernel is slightly more modular than I think you give it credit.
| Filesystems tend to be easy pieces of code to port

Yeah I have the Inside Windows 2000 book also and do understand more
about the internals than I think you give me credit for ;-).

|>When was the last time you actually defragmented your ext2 volume?

| Your words were "this is likely not possible". I was pointing out that
| it's merely work.

Your point is noted and I will try to be more specific in future.

Jon.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/+Mi1eTyyexZHHxERAhiTAJ93ldyT/MRI6ziCSaWWPMTwtO5YYgCfVkmD
lngavGkJwHWCyhRu9O/tRIA=
=Ugz3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

___________________________________________________________________

Sheffield Linux User's Group -
http://www.sheflug.co.uk/mailfaq.html

 GNU the choice of a complete generation.