Matthew Collins wrote:
Cost of application implementation is therefore considered low and this is considered attractive.Alex Hudson wrote:Neverless, ASP and PHP are frequently coded by inserting the code into the page template, rather than separating the code and layout.Nothing about ASP, PHP or mod_perl requires them to run embedded in a page or separate from a page. That is not an implementation issue.
Yes, and, as long as you know what you are doing with it, I still can't see where it's any less safe than running anything using php or even asp. mod_perl is supposed to be faster than perl with cgi and it's supposed to be faster than php but I don't have any stats on those claims at all. I am still not aware of any php claims to a superior security model.You're right. There is plenty of commercial mod_perl hosting because you
can always hire a server and do it yourself..... *chuckle*
and wasn't there something going around last year about Richmond using Suns?However, just because not many sites advertise on the official mod_perl site, doesn't mean that there is nobody running mod_perl. Due to my scoop experience, I know of several that will run mod_perl for you.
If you go to Microsoft.com, you won't find them advertising many hosting places that will run windows for you either, but I'm sure if you looked around you'd find some ;)